Perigon Partners · Research 2026 · First Edition

The low-carbon transition. It’s happening. Just not fast enough.

News cycles, political noise and fund flows have distorted the picture of where the energy transition actually stands. Our Low-Carbon Transition Index cuts through it. The direction of travel is clear. The pace is not.

$2.1tn

Global clean energy investment in 2024

90%

Of new power capacity from renewables in 2024

17m

Electric cars sold globally in 2024

50%

Reduction in UK annual emissions since 1990

The big picture

The headlines say chaos. The data says progress.

Perigon’s Low-Carbon Transition Index tracks seven real-economy indicators across energy, enablers and non-energy sectors. This is what the data shows.

Key findings

  • Absolute global emissions are still rising. But the underlying indicators show steady positive momentum since the Paris Agreement.
  • Renewables accounted for over 90% of all new power capacity added globally in 2024. The economics have tipped.
  • Economic growth and emissions reduction can happen at the same time. The UK halved its emissions whilst growing GDP by nearly 80%.
  • Corporate commitment is accelerating: 83% of C-suite leaders increased sustainability investment in the past year.
  • A clear acceleration in pace is required to meet even the IEA’s Stated Policies Scenario. Let alone net zero.

There is a persistent gap between how the energy transition is perceived and what is actually happening. Political attacks, investor nervousness and news cycles have created the impression of a stalling, contested, uncertain shift. The data tells a different story.

Since the Paris Agreement in 2015, every major leading indicator of transition progress has moved in the right direction. Renewable capacity is growing faster than any previous energy technology in history. Electric vehicle sales have exceeded even the most optimistic projections from a decade ago.

The question is no longer whether the transition is happening. It is whether it is happening fast enough. And on that question, the answer is: not yet.

“The transition could now unfold based solely on economic forces and technology tipping points. Without further policy action.”

BloombergNEF, New Energy Outlook 2025

BloombergNEF’s Economic Transition Scenario models a world where no new climate policy is enacted. It still projects $185 trillion of transition-related investment and spending — 85% of their full net-zero scenario. The economics have crossed a threshold. The technology has crossed a threshold. What remains uncertain is the pace.

Perigon’s LCTI · Scorecard

Seven indicators. One clear direction. Not enough speed.

Each indicator scored on direction of travel and performance relative to what is required to align to the IEA’s 2035 Stated Policies goals.

Electricity greening

Renewables 46% of installed global capacity, up from 43%

On track
🔋
Battery storage

23% growth in 2025 despite policy headwinds

Needs pace
🚗
Transport electrification

EV share exceeded 20% of global car sales in 2024

On track
🏭
Industrial electrification

Progress positive but below pace required for STEPS

Needs pace
🏠
Buildings electrification

Electricity share of total final energy consumption rising

Needs pace
📉
Energy intensity of GDP

Improved 1.2% in 2024; must reach 2.2% per year for STEPS

Needs pace
🌱
Low-carbon fuels share

Share increasing steadily; hydrogen scaling slower than expected

On track
🌳
Deforestation

2024 rate 63% above the trajectory needed for zero deforestation by 2030

Off track
Section 01 · Emissions

Global emissions have not peaked. But the trajectory is changing.

The bottom line of transition progress. Absolute emissions are still rising. But the composition is shifting, and high-income countries have already begun the descent.

Key findings

  • Global CO₂ emissions from burning fossil fuels reached nearly 40 billion tonnes in 2024. They have not yet peaked.
  • High-income countries have been reducing annual emissions for fifteen years — more than offset by growth in China and Asia.
  • The UK halved its annual emissions from 1990 to 2022, whilst growing its economy by nearly 80%. The decoupling is real.
  • Emissions from domestic transport are now the largest source of annual UK emissions, overtaking energy supply.

Since the first Conference of the Parties in Berlin in 1995, global emissions have grown rapidly. The pace of growth has slowed since Paris in 2015. Ten years on, the primary source of human-caused emissions has yet to peak.

The regional picture is more nuanced. The United Kingdom’s record is particularly striking: a 50% reduction in annual emissions between 1990 and 2022, alongside GDP growth of nearly 80%. That progress has been offset by strong growth from China, which now accounts for close to a quarter of global annual emissions alone.

~40bn
Tonnes of CO₂
From fossil fuels in 2024
50%
UK emissions cut
1990–2022, economy grew 80%
~50%
Of global emissions
Now from China and Asia
40%
Less carbon per kWh
European electricity vs a decade ago

Global CO₂ trend: fossil fuels (indexed)

Annual emissions from fossil fuel combustion, 2000–2024. Source: Our World in Data / Hannah Ritchie (2022)

UK: Emissions vs GDP, 1990–2022

Indexed to 1990 = 100. Demonstrates decoupling of economic growth from emissions. Source: UK Government

Section 02 · Enablers

Policy held. Investment grew. Carbon must get more expensive.

The structural conditions for transition — policy, capital and corporate commitment — have continued to strengthen in 2025, despite unprecedented political pressure.

Key findings

  • 37 jurisdictions covering 85% of global emissions have all strengthened climate policy ambition since 2020. Formal rollbacks occurred in only one: the United States.
  • Nearly 11,000 companies have set or committed to set science-based emissions targets, representing over 40% of global market capitalisation.
  • Global energy transition investment hit $2.1 trillion in 2024. China drove two-thirds of the global increase.
  • Under all NGFS transition scenarios, the weighted average global carbon price moves beyond $100 per tonne by 2030 — five times the current price.

The narrative of a global policy retreat on climate is largely fiction. The Oxford Climate Policy Monitor, which tracks rules across 37 jurisdictions covering more than 85% of global emissions, found that all 37 show increases in ambition, stringency and comprehensiveness since 2020. The US is the only jurisdiction to have recorded formal rollbacks.

Capital flows tell the same story. Global investment in the energy transition reached $2.1 trillion in 2024. The Asia-Pacific region grew fastest at 21% year-on-year, surpassing $1 trillion for the first time.

$5×

Carbon price by 2030

Under every NGFS transition scenario, the weighted average global carbon price exceeds $100 per tonne by 2030. Five times its current level. Companies that have not prepared for this will feel it.

40%

Of global market cap

Science-based targets now cover over 40% of global market capitalisation and a quarter of global revenue. This is not a niche movement.

Global energy transition investment ($bn)

Annual investment in energy transition assets, 2019–2024. Source: BloombergNEF, January 2025

SBTi company commitments (cumulative)

Companies that have set or committed to set science-based emissions reduction targets. Source: SBTi Trend Tracker, August 2025

Section 03 · Energy indicators

Renewables have won the economics argument. Storage must catch up.

The energy transition indicators show the strongest performance across Perigon’s index. Renewables dominate new capacity. EVs are accelerating. The bottleneck is now storage and grid integration.

Key findings

  • Renewables accounted for over 90% of total new power capacity added globally in 2024. Their share of total installed capacity rose from 43% to 46%.
  • Electric car sales exceeded 17 million globally in 2024. In China, EVs now represent almost half of all new car sales.
  • Electric car sales in 2025 are expected to exceed 20 million — more than a quarter of all cars sold worldwide.
  • Energy storage additions are expected to grow 23% in 2025. Storage capacity needs to grow 10× by 2035 to meet IEA’s stated policies scenario.
  • Global energy intensity improved by 1.2% in 2024. It needs to nearly double to 2.2% per year to align to STEPS by 2035.

Renewable energy is no longer the environmentally correct choice. It is the economically rational one. The levelised cost of electricity from most forms of renewable power has continued to fall, making renewables the most cost-effective power source for the majority of countries.

Electric vehicle adoption has exceeded nearly every mainstream forecast from a decade ago. The 3.5 million additional electric cars sold in 2024 compared to 2023 is greater than the total number of electric vehicles sold worldwide in 2020. China maintains a commanding lead: EVs now represent almost half of all new car sales.

90%+
New power capacity
From renewables in 2024
17m
EV sales in 2024
More than all EVs sold globally through 2020
10×
Storage growth needed
2024 to 2035 to meet IEA STEPS
2×+
China solar in H1 2025
Installed vs rest of world combined

Global EV sales share (%)

Electric vehicle share of total car sales globally. Source: IEA Global EV Outlook 2025

Renewable share of installed capacity (%)

Share of renewables in total global installed power capacity. Source: IRENA, 2025

“In the first half of 2025, China installed more than twice as much solar capacity as the rest of the world combined.”

Ember Energy, August 2025
Section 04 · Non-energy indicators

The energy story is positive. The rest is harder.

Beyond the electricity grid and the EV transition, the non-energy indicators present a more troubling picture. Deforestation and carbon capture both require substantial acceleration.

Key findings

  • Global deforestation in 2024 was 63% above the rate required to achieve zero deforestation by 2030. We have made almost no progress since the 2018–2020 baseline.
  • Carbon capture and storage (CCUS) has over 700 projects in development. But even announced capacity leaves a 40% gap to IEA’s net-zero requirements by 2030.
  • Potential CO₂ captured by 2030: 435 million tonnes per year. Required for net zero: approximately 1 billion tonnes per year.
Deforestation

63% off the trajectory. We have lost almost four years.

Achieving zero deforestation by 2030 requires a 10% annual reduction in the global deforestation rate from the 2018–2020 baseline. In 2024, the actual rate was 2% below baseline. Not 10%. Four years of pledges have not translated into measurable action on the ground.

Source: WRI Deforestation and Restoration Targets Tracker, May 2025

Carbon capture

700 projects in development. A 40% gap remains.

Momentum has grown substantially, with over 700 projects at various development stages. But even the most optimistic scenario — including all announced storage capacity — leaves a 40% gap to the 1 billion tonnes per year required in the IEA’s net-zero scenario by 2030.

Source: IEA Carbon Capture, Utilisation and Storage, April 2024

Deforestation rate vs target trajectory (indexed)

Actual vs required annual deforestation reduction. Baseline: 2018–2020. Source: WRI, 2025

CCUS capacity: current vs required (MtCO₂/yr)

Current operational, announced and net-zero requirement for 2030. Source: IEA, 2024

Section 05 · Corporate transition

Corporate ambition is real. Delivery is still a work in progress.

The corporate transition is accelerating but uneven. Commitment is ahead of execution. The gap between stated ambition and disclosed progress is narrowing, but has not yet closed.

Key findings

  • 83% of C-suite leaders increased sustainability investment in the past year. 97% expect to do so over the next three years.
  • The share of 2,000 major companies disclosing Scope 3 emissions rose from 36% in 2022 to 49% in 2024. Climate scenario planning rose from 52% to 64%.
  • Science-based targets now cover over 40% of global market capitalisation, and a quarter of global revenue.
  • Accenture’s 2025 analysis finds that 38% of large companies are on track to meet their net-zero targets. That means 62% are not.

The corporate transition has moved from early adopters to mainstream. At the largest companies, sustainability is now a board-level priority with disclosed targets, explicit investment and defined governance. At mid-sized companies, the picture is more mixed. At smaller companies, the journey is often just beginning.

Corporate Management Quality scores (2,000 companies)

Distribution across TPI Management Quality levels 0–5. Source: TPI, State of the Corporate Transition, September 2025

Corporate disclosure improvements (%)

Share of 2,000 assessed companies with each disclosure practice, 2022 vs 2024. Source: TPI, 2025

Appendix · Methodology & sources

How we built this. So you can check our working.

Full methodology, data sources and glossary for the Low-Carbon Transition Index.

Analytical framework

Perigon’s LCTI assigns each indicator a score for its performance versus the prior year (direction of travel) and a score relative to what is required to align to the 2035 goals of the IEA’s Stated Policies Scenario (STEPS). The two scores are combined for each indicator, with a higher weighting (60%) applied to relative performance, before being aggregated into overall scores out of 100.

Data sources

IndicatorPrimary sourceDate
Global CO₂ emissionsOur World in Data / Hannah Ritchie (2022)2024
Renewable energy capacityIRENA, Renewables in 2024: 5 Key FactsApril 2025
Energy transition investmentBloombergNEF, Energy Transition Investment TrendsJanuary 2025
Electric vehicle salesIEA, Global EV Outlook 2025July 2025
Energy storageBloombergNEF, 2H 2025 Energy Storage Market Outlook; IEA WEO 2025October 2025
Energy intensityIEA World Energy Outlook 20252025
Climate policyOxford Climate Policy Monitor Annual ReviewNovember 2025
Science-based targetsSBTi Trend TrackerAugust 2025
Carbon pricing scenariosNGFS Short-term Climate ScenariosMay 2025
DeforestationWRI Deforestation and Restoration Targets TrackerMay 2025
Carbon captureIEA Carbon Capture, Utilisation and StorageApril 2024
Corporate management qualityTransition Pathway Initiative, State of the Corporate TransitionSeptember 2025
C-suite sustainability prioritiesDeloitte 2025 C-Suite Sustainability Report2025
Corporate decarbonisationAccenture, Destination Net Zero 20252025
Investor intentionsMorgan Stanley Institute for Sustainable Investing, 2025November 2025
UK emissions and GDPUK Climate Change Commission, Seventh Carbon Budget; DESNZ 20252025

Glossary

TermDefinition
LCTILow-Carbon Transition Index: Perigon’s annual index tracking real-economy transition progress
STEPSStated Policies Scenario: IEA scenario reflecting currently announced policies and targets
NZENet Zero Emissions by 2050 scenario (IEA)
SBTiScience Based Targets initiative: sets and validates corporate emissions reduction targets
CCUSCarbon Capture, Utilisation and Storage
NGFSNetwork for Greening the Financial System
TPITransition Pathway Initiative: academic and investor body assessing corporate transition quality
IRENAInternational Renewable Energy Agency
BNEFBloombergNEF: energy transition research arm of Bloomberg
WRIWorld Resources Institute

This report was prepared by Perigon Partners. Analysis as of January 2026. All sources cited in full above.

Perigon’s Data Explorer

Explore the transition data. Your way.

Select any metric to compare against investment, corporate commitment or emissions trends.

EV share of car sales (%)
EV share of car sales (%)
Renewable share of capacity (%)
Energy transition investment ($bn)
SBTi company commitments (cumulative)
Carbon price trajectory ($/tonne CO₂)
Scope 3 disclosure (%)
Bar chart
Bar chart
Line chart